Comments on: NEWCASTLE UNITED VS CHELSEA - Mourinho saves democracy.

by: Niall_4

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:28:25 +0000

Chelsea should have been awarded a penalty for a handball by Stephen Carr. But thats football Last Year Chelsea got all the decisons so they should stop complaining

by: Bean

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:47:26 +0000

Why no mention anywhere of Drogba handling the ball in his own box from a corner??

by: george

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:11 +0000

i think it wasnt a pen stop winging morihnio…..
most people want man u 2 win da title so u can shut up!!
pompey 4 uefa cup!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by: miguel

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:33:20 +0000

That is what a penalty is Alicia… give a chance to penalize the ofending team for a penalty.
but as you know its not easy just ask the England boys.

by: Alicia

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:00:44 +0000

who knows that chelsea will win??..whoever might kick the ball into the post or out or even the keeper might be lucky and save it…

by: miguel

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:41:27 +0000

Mourinho’s was spot on its about time the premier league uses tv to help the refs
just have a look at www.rightresult.net

by: Loki

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:21:13 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIoq94P9YiM

PENALTY! Peacock’s bang on the money too, and I can’t stand Chelsea but this weekend they were robbed of the chance to win their third title.

by: Jason

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:19:19 +0000

Chelsea guys are tired - 60 games on their legs for heavens’ sake! If they did not win was because they lacked enough stamina to push to goal not the penalty excuse - the possibility of catching Man Untd would be more than enough for them to make the game… if they did not match the needed performance it is simply because they are out of breath. I sincerely hope they can catch up with Liverpool but I am afraid the title was in their hands for 90 minutes and window of opportunity is closed now… Mourinho is simply try to put responsability outside their team in order to protect the psychological damage. As simple as that. He is not “distracted” with the stories he tells to other people…

by: Joe Blofell

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:47:20 +0000

To be honest I thought it was a penalty. I also thought the Sibierski one could have easily been blown up as well. I’ll go penalty.

by: steve wren

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:52:07 +0000

I am not convinced that there was intent to handle the ball (or intent to put the hand in a position where it was likely to be struck by the ball).

My considered view would be “no penalty”