<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WIGAN vs MIDDLESBROUGH - Downing&#8217;s double-touch</title>
	<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2007/05/08/wigan-vs-middlesbrough-downings-double-touch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2007/05/08/wigan-vs-middlesbrough-downings-double-touch/#comment-297</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 11:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rightresult.net/2007/05/08/wigan-vs-middlesbrough-downings-double-touch/#comment-297</guid>
					<description>I agree with Paul Jewell that the double touch was extremely probable, but even still frames on MOTD weren't conclusive, so we can't reasonably expect the referee to catch what still frames couldn't. The free kick award itself was a bit soft, so even as a Boro fan I'd have to admit we were lucky with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Paul Jewell that the double touch was extremely probable, but even still frames on MOTD weren&#8217;t conclusive, so we can&#8217;t reasonably expect the referee to catch what still frames couldn&#8217;t. The free kick award itself was a bit soft, so even as a Boro fan I&#8217;d have to admit we were lucky with this one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chewyblue</title>
		<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2007/05/08/wigan-vs-middlesbrough-downings-double-touch/#comment-296</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rightresult.net/2007/05/08/wigan-vs-middlesbrough-downings-double-touch/#comment-296</guid>
					<description>I'm not sure about this one - he didn't intentionally do it. Isn't there anything in the rules about that. A bit like if you handball in the box clearly unintentionally then it generally doesn't get penalised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about this one - he didn&#8217;t intentionally do it. Isn&#8217;t there anything in the rules about that. A bit like if you handball in the box clearly unintentionally then it generally doesn&#8217;t get penalised.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
