Comments on: MANCHESTER UNITED v NEWCASTLE UNITED - After eight? http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/ Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:06:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Colm http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-3705 Sat, 17 May 2008 09:32:44 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-3705 8-1 to Man U? What a joke. Newc had 4 big decisions against them. 1) Owen goal was onside 2) Ronaldo wasnt fouled for first goal freekick 3) Tevez goal never crossed the line 4) Ferdinand was offside for his goal Is this site done by a Man U fan? right result should be 4-2 Man U and thats only if you ignore all the blatant Ronaldo dives which should result in 2 bookings at some stage. 8-1 to Man U? What a joke. Newc had 4 big decisions against them.

1) Owen goal was onside

2) Ronaldo wasnt fouled for first goal freekick

3) Tevez goal never crossed the line

4) Ferdinand was offside for his goal

Is this site done by a Man U fan?

right result should be 4-2 Man U and thats only if you ignore all the blatant Ronaldo dives which should result in 2 bookings at some stage.

]]> by: devrat http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-3173 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:49:00 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-3173 you know what...about all the stupid ref decisons....someone lead roy keane to this site...he'll become a lifetime paying member and also joinup on the editorial board... you know what…about all the stupid ref decisons….someone lead roy keane to this site…he’ll become a lifetime paying member and also joinup on the editorial
board…

]]> by: Neil Leathers http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-2829 Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:07:02 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-2829 your forgetting the steven carr tacle on rio ferdinand in the box, it was a blatant push and should have been a penalty. right result 9-1....or 10-1 because Newcastle really do suck. your forgetting the steven carr tacle on rio ferdinand in the box, it was a blatant push and should have been a penalty. right result 9-1….or 10-1 because Newcastle really do suck.

]]> by: charles http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1951 Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:27:07 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1951 Ooops... I wrote it should've been 7-1 when in reality it should've been 5-1. Ooops…

I wrote it should’ve been 7-1 when in reality it should’ve been 5-1.

]]> by: charles http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1949 Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:03:31 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1949 The right result is considerably less. Man U's first shouldn't have stood because Ronaldo dived, and Rooney illegally blocked off Shay Given for what proved to be Man U's second. One of the penalties should have been given, the other probably not. 7-1 is the right result. If we weren't stupid defenders, it would be 0-1. The right result is considerably less.

Man U’s first shouldn’t have stood because Ronaldo dived, and Rooney illegally blocked off Shay Given for what proved to be Man U’s second.

One of the penalties should have been given, the other probably not.

7-1 is the right result.

If we weren’t stupid defenders, it would be 0-1.

]]> by: Andy Star http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1666 Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:10:42 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1666 Hey ya. I totaly disagree with the 8-1 score. Owen should have given NUFC the lead 1-0, and there is no way they would have lost 8-1 after leading 1-0. Maybe Giggs should have been awarded a penalty, so I can give them a goal there to be fair. Ronaldos first goal was never ever a free kick and the last goal was never over the line. Then we will have a right result of 5-1... If you also remove the mistakes from the Newcastle defend we would have a 2-1 score :D Hey ya.

I totaly disagree with the 8-1 score.

Owen should have given NUFC the lead 1-0, and there is no way they would have lost 8-1 after leading 1-0.

Maybe Giggs should have been awarded a penalty, so I can give them a goal there to be fair.

Ronaldos first goal was never ever a free kick and the last goal was never over the line. Then we will have a right result of 5-1…

If you also remove the mistakes from the Newcastle defend we would have a 2-1 score :D

]]> by: shing http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1505 Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:57:50 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1505 i think no penalties are right Therefore 6-1 i think no penalties are right
Therefore 6-1

]]> by: Steve http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1495 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:17:51 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1495 The ball for the 6th goal did not cross the line (recall the whole ball must cross the line and the TV replays showed that only 3/4 or so did so). This is a commonly misunderstood law by so called knowledgable commentators. You must be able to see BOTH sides of the ball beyond the post not just SOME or MOST of the ball. Therefore 7-1 The ball for the 6th goal did not cross the line (recall the whole ball must cross the line and the TV replays showed that only 3/4 or so did so).

This is a commonly misunderstood law by so called knowledgable commentators. You must be able to see BOTH sides of the ball beyond the post not just SOME or MOST of the ball.

Therefore 7-1

]]> by: Blueheaven http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1490 Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:12:59 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1490 Totally agree, Ronaldo did dive and so his first hat-trick shouldn't count, nice! The RR site should factor in this kind of stuff - ie he should have been booked twice, good idea Andrew. BUT on that basis he'd miss the next 3 games so how do you factor that in...? Just apply it to the specific game I guess would be fair. Totally agree, Ronaldo did dive and so his first hat-trick shouldn’t count, nice!

The RR site should factor in this kind of stuff - ie he should have been booked twice, good idea Andrew. BUT on that basis he’d miss the next 3 games so how do you factor that in…? Just apply it to the specific game I guess would be fair.

]]> by: Andrew http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1489 Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:06:00 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/01/14/manchester-united-v-newcastle-united-after-eight/#comment-1489 You've got this wrong. Ronaldo dived to try get penalty in the first half rules are thats a booking, then dived for free kick for first goal equals second yellow - red card. 3 goals taken off there. Then there was the sixth which clearly didn't cross the line. Correct score 4-1. You’ve got this wrong. Ronaldo dived to try get penalty in the first half rules are thats a booking, then dived for free kick for first goal equals second yellow - red card. 3 goals taken off there. Then there was the sixth which clearly didn’t cross the line. Correct score 4-1.

]]>