<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BIRMINGHAM CITY v ARSENAL - Cold comfort</title>
	<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-3701</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-3701</guid>
					<description>Sorry - the last comment was in relation to the Middlesbro game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry - the last comment was in relation to the Middlesbro game
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-3700</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-3700</guid>
					<description>You cant chalk the Arsenal goal off just because it resulted from a wrongly given corner. What about the corner at the end when the ref blew early for full time? Maybe theyd hve scpred then.

The site should stick to key decisions only and not minor ones that just happened to end up  as a goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cant chalk the Arsenal goal off just because it resulted from a wrongly given corner. What about the corner at the end when the ref blew early for full time? Maybe theyd hve scpred then.</p>
<p>The site should stick to key decisions only and not minor ones that just happened to end up  as a goal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Neil Leathers</title>
		<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-2537</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-2537</guid>
					<description>I thought the McFadden infringement was obstruction, nothing else.  Not sure if the rules have changed, but this would have been an indirect free kick in the old days.  Am I out of date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the McFadden infringement was obstruction, nothing else.  Not sure if the rules have changed, but this would have been an indirect free kick in the old days.  Am I out of date?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-2122</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rightresult.net/2008/02/25/birmingham-city-v-arsenal-cold-comfort/#comment-2122</guid>
					<description>3-0 should be the right score because the McFadden free kick wasnt a foul by any means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3-0 should be the right score because the McFadden free kick wasnt a foul by any means.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
