Comments on: BIRMINGHAM CITY v LIVERPOOL - Driven to distraction http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/ Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:14:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: donga http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3630 Wed, 14 May 2008 22:25:59 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3630 Talking of omissions, there doesn't seem to be any mention of Andy Johnson's elbowed goal against Sunderland. Should this not have resulted in a two-point deduction to the forever-wronged Toffees? Talking of omissions, there doesn’t seem to be any mention of Andy Johnson’s elbowed goal against Sunderland. Should this not have resulted in a two-point deduction to the forever-wronged Toffees?

]]> by: James McGlone http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3500 Thu, 08 May 2008 11:14:39 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3500 Liverpool in bad-luck probe. Perhaps the FA will add the points on to Special Dispension FC's tally post-season to stop the crying. I can imagine a new banner being brought out for this one "THE KOP WEEPS" Liverpool in bad-luck probe. Perhaps the FA will add the points on to Special Dispension FC’s tally post-season to stop the crying.

I can imagine a new banner being brought out for this one “THE KOP WEEPS”

]]> by: Scrooge http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3406 Sat, 03 May 2008 18:15:13 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3406 Evidently it seems like alot of people don't know the rule of "offside". Jaidi was clearly offside by a couple of meters, right? What was his purpose by standing there? I'm guessing distract and cover Reinas view which means that he affects the game therefore he was offside. Don't understand how you can even argue about that. Evidently it seems like alot of people don’t know the rule of “offside”. Jaidi was clearly offside by a couple of meters, right? What was his purpose by standing there? I’m guessing distract and cover Reinas view which means that he affects the game therefore he was offside. Don’t understand how you can even argue about that.

]]> by: Brice http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3348 Thu, 01 May 2008 01:12:39 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3348 It wouldn't nullify this websites existence, but maybe its purpose. I've been viewing this website basically since its birth, and this is the only ruling that I can remember that I disagreed. It wouldn’t nullify this websites existence, but maybe its purpose. I’ve been viewing this website basically since its birth, and this is the only ruling that I can remember that I disagreed.

]]> by: Phil http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3342 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:19:53 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3342 So by your ruling Franny does that mean that even Right Result.net get things wrong? Wouldn't that completely nullify this website's existence??? So by your ruling Franny does that mean that even Right Result.net get things wrong?

Wouldn’t that completely nullify this website’s existence???

]]> by: steve http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3339 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:31:18 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3339 Problem is now they have messed about with the offside rule no one understands it because the officials that changed it dont understand it and give differcult individual opinions all the time, just look how many cases their are on here for offside goals that should have stood and vise versa. What was wrong with the old offside rule, it was basic and everyone understood it!! Problem is now they have messed about with the offside rule no one understands it because the officials that changed it dont understand it and give differcult individual opinions all the time, just look how many cases their are on here for offside goals that should have stood and vise versa. What was wrong with the old offside rule, it was basic and everyone understood it!!

]]> by: Franny http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3334 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:37:39 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3334 There is no referee that would've given Jaidi offside so I suggest you change this result back to 2-2. There is no referee that would’ve given Jaidi offside so I suggest you change this result back to 2-2.

]]> by: Brice http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3328 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:39:56 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3328 I am not a Birmingham fan, in fact I want to see them relegated for what they did to Eduardo, but this goal is perfectly legal. Jaidi was in no way "direct line" with Riena's vision. He was off to the side, and this is perfectly clear when you see the view from behind the goal. Reina could see the ball clearly all the way.Reina was just surprised someone would stand there. Anyways he wouldn't of stopped the free kick, it was a great effort by the former gooner Larsson. I am not a Birmingham fan, in fact I want to see them relegated for what they did to Eduardo, but this goal is perfectly legal. Jaidi was in no way “direct line” with Riena’s vision. He was off to the side, and this is perfectly clear when you see the view from behind the goal. Reina could see the ball clearly all the way.Reina was just surprised someone would stand there. Anyways he wouldn’t of stopped the free kick, it was a great effort by the former gooner Larsson.

]]> by: Phil http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3317 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:33:18 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3317 Against Everton Jaidi was played onside by Lescott and another Everton player on Tim Howards line. That is why it is a different outcome. Against Everton Jaidi was played onside by Lescott and another Everton player on Tim Howards line.

That is why it is a different outcome.

]]> by: steven moorcroft http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3300 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:56:20 +0000 http://www.rightresult.net/2008/04/28/birmingham-city-v-liverpool-driven-to-distraction/#comment-3300 john, great minds and all that-just the minute difference !! john,

great minds and all that-just the minute difference !!

]]>